From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] percpu fixes for 2.6.32-rc6
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:55:55 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AFA35CB.5030801@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0911101338190.31845@localhost.localdomain>
Hello,
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I want the cleanup because I think that the code sucks from a "future
> proofing" and readability standpoint, but I really don't mind one way or
> the other whether you want to finally do that one "return 1" correctly for
> one commit, only to then fix it to not do that three-way test of a single
> function in the next one.
>
> So whatever works - as long as the end result both looks sane and doesn't
> have the bug we clearly have now.
I was mostly worrying about introducing unrelated bug while changing.
Anyways, one patch it is. I'll route it through tip as suggested by
Ingo in a few hours.
Thanks a lot.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-11 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-10 6:04 [GIT PULL] percpu fixes for 2.6.32-rc6 Tejun Heo
2009-11-10 17:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-10 18:33 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-10 18:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-10 19:25 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-10 19:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 19:50 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-10 21:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-11 3:55 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-11-11 11:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-11 12:21 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-11 19:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 10:11 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 10:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 10:58 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 11:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 14:26 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-11-12 15:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-12 15:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 15:45 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 15:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-12 17:04 ` Andres Baldrich
2009-11-12 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-12 18:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 18:14 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-12 11:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 11:29 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-11 8:49 ` [PATCH percpu#for-linus] percpu: restructure pcpu_extend_area_map() to fix bugs and improve readability Tejun Heo
2009-11-11 19:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-10 19:44 ` [GIT PULL] percpu fixes for 2.6.32-rc6 Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-13 3:53 Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AFA35CB.5030801@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.