From: "ramaswamy.bm" <ramaswamy.bm@globaledgesoft.com>
To: kaber@trash.net
Cc: arrow.jianqing@gmail.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Subject: RE: port bound SAs : ip xfm state command ?
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:17:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AFA6C0D.2020101@globaledgesoft.com> (raw)
What is the command to write port based SA's using ip xfrm state.
iam using below command for writing SA's :
ip xfrm state add src 192.168.1.20 dst 192.168.1.5 proto esp spi
0x354cb04b mode tunnel reqid 16385 replay-window 32 auth sha1
0xecf02a5cf6568556e1bdcd961c7ec3f92afd01cc enc aes
0x5c0cfa9672ce67ba545b593076dfb278 sel src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0
Thanks in advance
Ram
he pfkey / xfrm interface throws them away
i fixed racoon to send the port numbers and they were ignored
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick McHardy [mailto:kaber@...sh.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 9:12 AM
To: Paul Moore
Cc: David Miller; netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: port bound SAs
Paul Moore wrote:
> i did exactly that (in the original message) and it makes this test
case
> work but as I point out
>
> a) it should not be necessary
> b) i get more SAs than I need
> c) i can no longer say that a SA is optional (this is an error in the
> pfkey/xfrm/racoon interface to combine two orthogonal concepts)
> d) I am not convinced that I have resolved all cases. Needs more
testing
IIRC I tested port selectors in SA a few years ago using "ip xfrm"
and they worked fine. The xfrm interface doesn't ignore them
(copy_from_user_state()), I think the pfkey interface also doesn't.
Please try configuring them manually using "ip xfrm state",
I'm pretty sure the bug is actually in racoon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2009-11-11 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-11 7:47 ramaswamy.bm [this message]
2009-11-11 23:15 ` Subject: RE: port bound SAs : ip xfm state command ? Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AFA6C0D.2020101@globaledgesoft.com \
--to=ramaswamy.bm@globaledgesoft.com \
--cc=arrow.jianqing@gmail.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.