diff for duplicates of <4AFC79B2.6060203@cam.ac.uk>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 659eb27..2fbade9 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -381,49 +381,49 @@ see most hwmon drivers.)
 > +	case 0x20:	/* -X */
 > +		if (te9->pdata->negate_x)
 > +			dir = 0x10;
-> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_y == 0)
+> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_y = 0)
 > +			dir >>= 2;
-> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_z == 0)
+> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_z = 0)
 > +			dir >>= 4;
 > +		break;
 > +	case 0x10:	/* +X */
 > +		if (te9->pdata->negate_x)
 > +			dir = 0x20;
-> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_y == 0)
+> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_y = 0)
 > +			dir >>= 2;
-> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_z == 0)
+> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_z = 0)
 > +			dir >>= 4;
 > +		break;
 > +	case 0x08:	/* -Y */
 > +		if (te9->pdata->negate_y)
 > +			dir = 0x04;
-> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_x == 1)
+> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_x = 1)
 > +			dir <<= 2;
-> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_z == 1)
+> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_z = 1)
 > +			dir >>= 2;
 > +		break;
 > +	case 0x04:	/* +Y */
 > +		if (te9->pdata->negate_y)
 > +			dir = 0x08;
-> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_x == 1)
+> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_x = 1)
 > +			dir <<= 2;
-> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_z == 1)
+> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_z = 1)
 > +			dir >>= 2;
 > +		break;
 > +	case 0x02:	/* -Z */
 > +		if (te9->pdata->negate_z)
 > +			dir = 0x01;
-> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_x == 2)
+> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_x = 2)
 > +			dir <<= 4;
-> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_y == 2)
+> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_y = 2)
 > +			dir <<= 2;
 > +		break;
 > +	case 0x01:	/* +Z */
 > +		if (te9->pdata->negate_z)
 > +			dir = 0x02;
-> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_x == 2)
+> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_x = 2)
 > +			dir <<= 4;
-> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_y == 2)
+> +		if (te9->pdata->axis_map_y = 2)
 > +			dir <<= 2;
 > +		break;
 > +	default:
@@ -501,9 +501,8 @@ Some brackets might make this more readable? (I for one can never remember the p
 > +						!(b2s_comp & wuf_comp)) {
 > +			/* set the new poll interval based on wuf odr */
 > +			for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kxte9_odr_table); i++) {
-> +				te9->pdata->poll_interval =
-> +						kxte9_odr_table[i - 1].cutoff;
-> +				if (kxte9_odr_table[i].mask ==	wuf_comp << 3)
+> +				te9->pdata->poll_interval > +						kxte9_odr_table[i - 1].cutoff;
+> +				if (kxte9_odr_table[i].mask =	wuf_comp << 3)
 > +						break;
 > +			}
 > +			if (te9->input_dev) {
@@ -525,9 +524,8 @@ Some brackets might make this more readable? (I for one can never remember the p
 > +						!(b2s_comp & wuf_comp)) {
 > +			/* set the new poll interval based on b2s odr */
 > +			for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kxte9_odr_table); i++) {
-> +				te9->pdata->poll_interval =
-> +						kxte9_odr_table[i - 1].cutoff;
-> +				if (kxte9_odr_table[i].mask == b2s_comp << 3)
+> +				te9->pdata->poll_interval > +						kxte9_odr_table[i - 1].cutoff;
+> +				if (kxte9_odr_table[i].mask = b2s_comp << 3)
 > +						break;
 > +			}
 > +			if (te9->input_dev) {
@@ -882,9 +880,9 @@ data then it is their own fault.  Still, I guess it does no harm.
 > +					te9->pdata->min_interval);
 > +	if (te9->pdata->axis_map_x > 2 ||
 > +	    te9->pdata->axis_map_y > 2 || te9->pdata->axis_map_z > 2 ||
-> +	    te9->pdata->axis_map_x == te9->pdata->axis_map_y ||
-> +	    te9->pdata->axis_map_x == te9->pdata->axis_map_z ||
-> +	    te9->pdata->axis_map_y == te9->pdata->axis_map_z) {
+> +	    te9->pdata->axis_map_x = te9->pdata->axis_map_y ||
+> +	    te9->pdata->axis_map_x = te9->pdata->axis_map_z ||
+> +	    te9->pdata->axis_map_y = te9->pdata->axis_map_z) {
 > +		dev_err(&te9->client->dev,
 > +			"invalid axis_map value x:%u y:%u z:%u\n",
 > +			te9->pdata->axis_map_x, te9->pdata->axis_map_y,
@@ -957,7 +955,7 @@ Might be worth checking whether something so generic is appropriate.
 > +	struct kxte9_data *te9;
 > +	int err = -1;
 > +
-> +	if (client->dev.platform_data == NULL) {
+> +	if (client->dev.platform_data = NULL) {
 > +		dev_err(&client->dev, "platform data is NULL. exiting.\n");
 > +		err = -ENODEV;
 > +		goto err0;
@@ -968,7 +966,7 @@ Might be worth checking whether something so generic is appropriate.
 > +		goto err0;
 > +	}
 > +	te9 = kzalloc(sizeof(*te9), GFP_KERNEL);
-> +	if (te9 == NULL) {
+> +	if (te9 = NULL) {
 > +		dev_err(&client->dev,
 > +			"failed to allocate memory for module data\n");
 > +		err = -ENOMEM;
@@ -989,7 +987,7 @@ to justify not using the main kernel one.
 > +		goto err1;
 > +	}
 > +	te9->pdata = kmalloc(sizeof(*te9->pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
-> +	if (te9->pdata == NULL)
+> +	if (te9->pdata = NULL)
 > +		goto err2;
 > +	memcpy(te9->pdata, client->dev.platform_data, sizeof(*te9->pdata));
 > +	err = kxte9_validate_pdata(te9);
@@ -1261,3 +1259,9 @@ use them as parameters it would be much cleaner.
 > +
 > +#endif  /* __KXTE9_H__ */
 > +
+
+
+_______________________________________________
+lm-sensors mailing list
+lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
+http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 35a0143..317e685 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
  "ref\01257877729-25647-1-git-send-email-chudson@kionix.com\0"
  "From\0Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH 1/3] hwmon:driver support for Kionix kxte9\taccelerometer\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH 1/3] hwmon:driver support for Kionix\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:10:10 +0000\0"
  "To\0chudson@kionix.com\0"
  "Cc\0LM Sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>"
@@ -390,49 +390,49 @@
  "> +\tcase 0x20:\t/* -X */\n"
  "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->negate_x)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir = 0x10;\n"
- "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_y == 0)\n"
+ "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_y = 0)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir >>= 2;\n"
- "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_z == 0)\n"
+ "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_z = 0)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir >>= 4;\n"
  "> +\t\tbreak;\n"
  "> +\tcase 0x10:\t/* +X */\n"
  "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->negate_x)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir = 0x20;\n"
- "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_y == 0)\n"
+ "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_y = 0)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir >>= 2;\n"
- "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_z == 0)\n"
+ "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_z = 0)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir >>= 4;\n"
  "> +\t\tbreak;\n"
  "> +\tcase 0x08:\t/* -Y */\n"
  "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->negate_y)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir = 0x04;\n"
- "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_x == 1)\n"
+ "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_x = 1)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir <<= 2;\n"
- "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_z == 1)\n"
+ "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_z = 1)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir >>= 2;\n"
  "> +\t\tbreak;\n"
  "> +\tcase 0x04:\t/* +Y */\n"
  "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->negate_y)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir = 0x08;\n"
- "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_x == 1)\n"
+ "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_x = 1)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir <<= 2;\n"
- "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_z == 1)\n"
+ "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_z = 1)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir >>= 2;\n"
  "> +\t\tbreak;\n"
  "> +\tcase 0x02:\t/* -Z */\n"
  "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->negate_z)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir = 0x01;\n"
- "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_x == 2)\n"
+ "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_x = 2)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir <<= 4;\n"
- "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_y == 2)\n"
+ "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_y = 2)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir <<= 2;\n"
  "> +\t\tbreak;\n"
  "> +\tcase 0x01:\t/* +Z */\n"
  "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->negate_z)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir = 0x02;\n"
- "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_x == 2)\n"
+ "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_x = 2)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir <<= 4;\n"
- "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_y == 2)\n"
+ "> +\t\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_y = 2)\n"
  "> +\t\t\tdir <<= 2;\n"
  "> +\t\tbreak;\n"
  "> +\tdefault:\n"
@@ -510,9 +510,8 @@
  "> +\t\t\t\t\t\t!(b2s_comp & wuf_comp)) {\n"
  "> +\t\t\t/* set the new poll interval based on wuf odr */\n"
  "> +\t\t\tfor (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kxte9_odr_table); i++) {\n"
- "> +\t\t\t\tte9->pdata->poll_interval =\n"
- "> +\t\t\t\t\t\tkxte9_odr_table[i - 1].cutoff;\n"
- "> +\t\t\t\tif (kxte9_odr_table[i].mask ==\twuf_comp << 3)\n"
+ "> +\t\t\t\tte9->pdata->poll_interval > +\t\t\t\t\t\tkxte9_odr_table[i - 1].cutoff;\n"
+ "> +\t\t\t\tif (kxte9_odr_table[i].mask =\twuf_comp << 3)\n"
  "> +\t\t\t\t\t\tbreak;\n"
  "> +\t\t\t}\n"
  "> +\t\t\tif (te9->input_dev) {\n"
@@ -534,9 +533,8 @@
  "> +\t\t\t\t\t\t!(b2s_comp & wuf_comp)) {\n"
  "> +\t\t\t/* set the new poll interval based on b2s odr */\n"
  "> +\t\t\tfor (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kxte9_odr_table); i++) {\n"
- "> +\t\t\t\tte9->pdata->poll_interval =\n"
- "> +\t\t\t\t\t\tkxte9_odr_table[i - 1].cutoff;\n"
- "> +\t\t\t\tif (kxte9_odr_table[i].mask == b2s_comp << 3)\n"
+ "> +\t\t\t\tte9->pdata->poll_interval > +\t\t\t\t\t\tkxte9_odr_table[i - 1].cutoff;\n"
+ "> +\t\t\t\tif (kxte9_odr_table[i].mask = b2s_comp << 3)\n"
  "> +\t\t\t\t\t\tbreak;\n"
  "> +\t\t\t}\n"
  "> +\t\t\tif (te9->input_dev) {\n"
@@ -891,9 +889,9 @@
  "> +\t\t\t\t\tte9->pdata->min_interval);\n"
  "> +\tif (te9->pdata->axis_map_x > 2 ||\n"
  "> +\t    te9->pdata->axis_map_y > 2 || te9->pdata->axis_map_z > 2 ||\n"
- "> +\t    te9->pdata->axis_map_x == te9->pdata->axis_map_y ||\n"
- "> +\t    te9->pdata->axis_map_x == te9->pdata->axis_map_z ||\n"
- "> +\t    te9->pdata->axis_map_y == te9->pdata->axis_map_z) {\n"
+ "> +\t    te9->pdata->axis_map_x = te9->pdata->axis_map_y ||\n"
+ "> +\t    te9->pdata->axis_map_x = te9->pdata->axis_map_z ||\n"
+ "> +\t    te9->pdata->axis_map_y = te9->pdata->axis_map_z) {\n"
  "> +\t\tdev_err(&te9->client->dev,\n"
  "> +\t\t\t\"invalid axis_map value x:%u y:%u z:%u\\n\",\n"
  "> +\t\t\tte9->pdata->axis_map_x, te9->pdata->axis_map_y,\n"
@@ -966,7 +964,7 @@
  "> +\tstruct kxte9_data *te9;\n"
  "> +\tint err = -1;\n"
  "> +\n"
- "> +\tif (client->dev.platform_data == NULL) {\n"
+ "> +\tif (client->dev.platform_data = NULL) {\n"
  "> +\t\tdev_err(&client->dev, \"platform data is NULL. exiting.\\n\");\n"
  "> +\t\terr = -ENODEV;\n"
  "> +\t\tgoto err0;\n"
@@ -977,7 +975,7 @@
  "> +\t\tgoto err0;\n"
  "> +\t}\n"
  "> +\tte9 = kzalloc(sizeof(*te9), GFP_KERNEL);\n"
- "> +\tif (te9 == NULL) {\n"
+ "> +\tif (te9 = NULL) {\n"
  "> +\t\tdev_err(&client->dev,\n"
  "> +\t\t\t\"failed to allocate memory for module data\\n\");\n"
  "> +\t\terr = -ENOMEM;\n"
@@ -998,7 +996,7 @@
  "> +\t\tgoto err1;\n"
  "> +\t}\n"
  "> +\tte9->pdata = kmalloc(sizeof(*te9->pdata), GFP_KERNEL);\n"
- "> +\tif (te9->pdata == NULL)\n"
+ "> +\tif (te9->pdata = NULL)\n"
  "> +\t\tgoto err2;\n"
  "> +\tmemcpy(te9->pdata, client->dev.platform_data, sizeof(*te9->pdata));\n"
  "> +\terr = kxte9_validate_pdata(te9);\n"
@@ -1269,6 +1267,12 @@
  "> +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */\n"
  "> +\n"
  "> +#endif  /* __KXTE9_H__ */\n"
- > +
+ "> +\n"
+ "\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "lm-sensors mailing list\n"
+ "lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org\n"
+ http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
 
-69bf39d86db60c0e680e0ec20e00de022e1ade2b5ee4774b8f4c685c1fb966ea
+8e8c34d258757800a19bb92c314aac1cfb38f12ca13ca97c8860edd8b9c366d2
