From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [216.168.135.169] (helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N8hiw-0005La-DU for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:01:05 +0100 Received: (qmail 18624 invoked by uid 1003); 12 Nov 2009 21:59:42 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.1.167?) (philip@opensdr.com@127.0.0.1) by mail.geekisp.com with SMTP; 12 Nov 2009 21:59:42 -0000 Message-ID: <4AFC854D.8040302@balister.org> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:59:41 -0500 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091014 Fedora/3.0-2.8.b4.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <200911120656.41249.holger+oe@freyther.de> <200911120722.09166.holger+oe@freyther.de> <4AFC58B0.3080000@mwester.net> <1258062144.13299.1.camel@gnutoo-desktop> In-Reply-To: <1258062144.13299.1.camel@gnutoo-desktop> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 216.168.135.169 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: philip@balister.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: xterm: either fix it, or remove it. please. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:01:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/12/2009 04:42 PM, GNUtoo wrote: >> Is it practical? I think the answer is no. In my experience, tools >> like selinux have a tendency to require inordinate amounts of >> administrative burden that just isn't practical in a development >> environment. I think requiring that selinux be disabled on build >> hosts >> is a reasonable requirement, and will avoid wasting a lot of cycles >> that >> should be spent on OE, and not on administration (or sending lots of >> emails). > What about supporting only the unconfined user selinux > type(unconfined_u),in targeted mode? I'm running default Selinux on F11, I don't think we can just say OE must have SELinux turned off. Philip > Denis. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >