From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:25:35 +0000 Message-ID: <4AFD7A6F.7020708@eu.citrix.com> References: <4AF82F12.6040400@amd.com> <4AF82FD8.6020409@eu.citrix.com> <4AFD69D9.4090204@amd.com> <4FA716B1526C7C4DB0375C6DADBC4EA342A71C17C9@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FA716B1526C7C4DB0375C6DADBC4EA342A71C17C9@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Pratt Cc: Andre Przywara , Dan Magenheimer , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Keir Fraser , Papagiannis Anastasios List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ian Pratt wrote: > In the case where a VM is asking for more vCPUs there are pCPUs in a node we should contain the guest to multiple nodes. (I presume we favour nodes according to the number of vCPUs they already have committed to them?) Seems like CPU load might be a better measure. Xen doesn't calculate load currently, but it's on my list of things to do. -George