From: Christian Volkmann <haveaniceday@cv-sv.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Does a kernel assisted file system reorder make sense?
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:39:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AFFDA7C.6010907@cv-sv.de> (raw)
Hi,
I just have read some articles about faster booting systems
(Ubuntu 9.10) , SSD, hard disks, latency and seek times...
Due to this I have some ideas which I like to discuss.
I am for sure not the first with this idea, but I do not
find any discussion about it. :)
Shouldn't it be possible for the kernel to provide an ordered
loaded block list read from disk ? This could be used for a kind
of "forced reorder" for a file system tool.
May be this would also fasten the system start from a hard disk.
I could imagine a scenario like:
- kernel start (boot loader )
- kernel to keep a list of the read blocks (on a per filesystem base)
- kernel to log this list just before init starts.
- on demand: kernel to continue the recording
- on demand: kernel can signaled to log this list.
(e.g. graphic log in ready )
This logged list could be use from a new tool like "e2reorder"
for ext2/3/4 to reorder the blocks within the file system(s) to
reduce the seek delay for a start from a hard disk.
The logged list could also be used as a "to load/cache first" list
for the kernel/initrd boot. This might fasten the start without
special file system tools or for file systems without support.
But this would only make sense if a system boot is delayed by
hard disk seek times. I have no SSD to check if a SSD boots
faster. Does anyone have the experience if a SSD boots faster?
Best regards,
Christian
next reply other threads:[~2009-11-15 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-15 10:39 Christian Volkmann [this message]
2009-11-15 11:38 ` Does a kernel assisted file system reorder make sense? Alexander Clouter
2009-11-15 13:37 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AFFDA7C.6010907@cv-sv.de \
--to=haveaniceday@cv-sv.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.