From: Tejun Heo <teheo@suse.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: GPF in run_workqueue()/list_del_init(cwq->worklist.next) on resume
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:01:33 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B01310D.3020609@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AFC5E96.1020609@kernel.org>
11/13/2009 04:14 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> making flush_work() behave as
>>> flush_work_sync() by default should be doable without too much
>>> overhead. I'll give it a shot.
Aieee... my estimate for cross cpu work queueing was way off.
Queueing on different cpus is very common - sometimes more so than on
the same cpu, so it looks like this can't be done without adding
significant overhead to queueing path. Giving up. :-(
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-16 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-09 11:50 Help needed: Resume problems in 2.6.32-rc, perhaps related to preempt_count leakage in keventd Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 11:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 12:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-09 12:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-09 12:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 12:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-09 12:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-09 14:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-09 14:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-09 14:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-09 14:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-09 14:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 14:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 14:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-09 15:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 15:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 16:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-09 16:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-09 17:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 17:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 18:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-09 18:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-09 20:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 20:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 20:31 ` Alan Stern
2009-11-09 20:31 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2009-11-09 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 21:24 ` Alan Stern
2009-11-09 21:24 ` Alan Stern
2009-11-09 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 20:45 ` GPF in run_workqueue()/list_del_init(cwq->worklist.next) on resume (was: Re: Help needed: Resume problems in 2.6.32-rc, perhaps related to preempt_count leakage in keventd) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 21:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-09 21:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-10 0:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-10 22:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-10 22:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-11 8:08 ` GPF in run_workqueue()/list_del_init(cwq->worklist.next) on resume Tejun Heo
2009-11-11 8:08 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-11 18:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-12 4:56 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 4:56 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 18:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-12 19:14 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 19:14 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 11:01 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-11-16 11:01 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 18:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-11 18:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-11 11:52 ` GPF in run_workqueue()/list_del_init(cwq->worklist.next) on resume (was: Re: Help needed: Resume problems in 2.6.32-rc, perhaps related to preempt_count leakage in keventd) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-11 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-11 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-11 20:18 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-11-11 20:18 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-11-11 20:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-11 20:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-11 21:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-11 21:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-11 21:13 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-11-11 21:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-11 21:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-11 21:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-11-11 21:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-11-11 21:13 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-11-11 11:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-11 16:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-11 16:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-11 20:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-11 20:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-11 20:20 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-11-11 20:20 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-11-11 20:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-11 20:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-11 20:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-11 21:15 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-11-11 21:15 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-11-11 20:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-11 17:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-11 17:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-11-12 17:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-12 19:17 ` GPF in run_workqueue()/list_del_init(cwq->worklist.next) on resume Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 20:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-12 20:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-12 19:17 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 20:53 ` GPF in run_workqueue()/list_del_init(cwq->worklist.next) on resume (was: Re: Help needed: Resume problems in 2.6.32-rc, perhaps related to preempt_count leakage in keventd) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-12 20:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-12 20:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-12 22:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-12 23:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-12 23:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-12 22:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-12 20:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-15 23:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-15 23:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-15 23:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-15 23:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-12 17:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-10 0:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 19:13 ` Help needed: Resume problems in 2.6.32-rc, perhaps related to preempt_count leakage in keventd Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-09 20:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 20:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 19:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-09 14:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-09 14:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 14:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 14:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-09 14:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-09 15:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 15:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-09 15:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-09 15:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-09 12:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B01310D.3020609@suse.de \
--to=teheo@suse.de \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.