From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sid Boyce Subject: Re: Is the OMAP patch process badly flawed? Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:44:34 +0000 Message-ID: <4B031942.5020106@blueyonder.co.uk> References: <20091116160402.deb0cc82.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4B0213AC.6050502@blueyonder.co.uk> <4B02A583.8090602@blueyonder.co.uk> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB030A8C911F@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <4B02AC98.8030507@blueyonder.co.uk> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB030A8C916A@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Reply-To: sboyce@blueyonder.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk ([195.188.213.8]:42160 "EHLO smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751968AbZKQVoe (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:44:34 -0500 Received: from [172.23.170.138] (helo=anti-virus01-09) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1NAVqq-0005o9-8k for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:44:40 +0000 Received: from [94.171.130.58] (helo=[192.168.10.2]) by asmtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1NAVqp-0005F4-P7 for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:44:39 +0000 In-Reply-To: <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB030A8C916A@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" On 17/11/09 14:51, Gadiyar, Anand wrote: > Sid Boyce wrote: > > > >>>> >>>> I would expect patches sent upstream would result in all the basics for >>>> long established platforms to be fully covered. Appreciating that >>>> development is quite fast paced with mods and supporting new platforms. >>>> Could someone please enlighten me? >>> >>> Sid, >>> >>> Speaking purely for EHCI, this is now queued up in Greg's USB queue >>> for upstream and will get merged in the next cycle. >>> >>> Until then, the linux-omap code does have working EHCI support >>> on beagle, evm and the other boards. If you're cloning from >>> gitorious, you're probably picking the wrong tree. >>> >>> - Anand >>> >>> >> >> Thanks, that explains a lot as I can't remember seeing those patches on >> the linux-usb list for submission upstream. >> What tree is best to clone? > > > Not sure which is best - I suppose that depends on what all you need. > The canonical linux-omap tree maintained by Tony is at [1]. > > For EHCI, Felipe sent the driver to Greg who queued it up for .33 [2]. > Tony lined up the board files and mach-omap2/usb-ehci.c in the for-next > branch. > > > > [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git > [2] http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/gregkh-07-usb-2.6.32-rc6.patch > > Thanks for the update and the patch. I downloaded the launchpad 2.6.31 kernel which I have currently running. Finally found one that outputs to the LCD. Regards Sid. -- Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support Specialist, Cricket Coach Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks