From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Juergen Urban <JuergenUrban@gmx.de>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: BUG() in end_page_writeback(), stack overflows and system speed decrease with XFS over USB
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:00:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0587B0.3020702@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911190957.45957.JuergenUrban@gmx.de>
Juergen Urban wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my machine is running very unstable since I use XFS on an external USB
> harddisc (855 GByte XFS partition on 1TByte). One problem was the stack
> overflows caused by the large stack use of XFS, USB, SCSI and VFS in Linux
> 2.6.23.13. NFS on XFS caused much more stack overflows. I think I got around
> the stack overflows by disabling preemption, SMP and NFS in Linux, but I am not
> sure about it. I think that I didn't got a message from the stack overflow
> detection after this.
Are you on 4k stacks? To be honest I'd still expect things to be mostly
ok stack-wise even if so.
> I also tried a Live-CD (KNOPPIX), but there are the same
> problems. I exchanged some of the hardware. XFS is decreasing system
> performance. I use the Linux VDR with DVB-S which seems to increase the
> problems. I was able to record 3 high bandwidth streams in parallel before
> using XFS.
Really, you could record 3 parallel high-def TV streams to ext3 via USB?
I guess I'm a little surprised...
> Now it has problems to record one high bandwidth stream. The
> system got a little bit usable after I changed the IO scheduler to deadline.
> It is difficult to get a good backtrace of the kernel crash, because the backlog
> is not saved on the internal harddisc (reiserfs and ext3). I was able to find
> out that XFS triggers a BUG() in end_page_writeback() at mm/filemap.c:552:
>
> void end_page_writeback(struct page *page)
> {
> if (!TestClearPageReclaim(page) || rotate_reclaimable_page(page)) {
> if (!test_clear_page_writeback(page))
> BUG();
> }
> smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
> wake_up_page(page, PG_writeback);
> }
Regarding the bug, if there is any way to test a kernel newer than .23,
I'd start there; I don't know offhand of a bug that was fixed here, but
.23 was a long time ago...
> The backtrace looks like this (Sorry, I needed to write it down from screen
> and I don't have everything):
>
> end_page_writeback()
> end_buffer_async_write()
> update_stats_wait_end()
> xfs_setfilesize()
> xfs_???_dealloc()
> xfs_destroy_ioend()
> run_workqueue()
>
> After searching in the code I found:
> /* TODO: cleanup count and page_dirty */
>
> It seems that page_dirty may be handled wrong and could cause the problem, but
> I don't know the purpose of this stuff. The same comment is in the latest
> source code from GIT.
> After running the system for while, I was able to trigger the kernel crash by
> starting "sync" in the command line.
> My stack traces includes often dvb_dmx_swfilter_packets(), do_IRQ()/tasklets
> and sys_write()/vfs_write(). I can't scroll up in most situations.
> Can anyone help me?
> Is there an easy way to backup the data or replace the file system without
> kernel crash in between?
You should certainly be able to copy data off xfs via usb; if it's
failing, I guess we'll need more info to find out why, but I'd suggest
at least booting a newer livecd to do that copy and see if things fare
better.
-Eric
> Best regards
> Juergen Urban
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-19 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-19 8:57 BUG() in end_page_writeback(), stack overflows and system speed decrease with XFS over USB Juergen Urban
2009-11-19 18:00 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-11-20 16:23 ` Juergen Urban
2009-11-20 16:36 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-11-20 17:08 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-11-21 1:00 ` Juergen Urban
2009-11-21 10:51 ` Michael Monnerie
2009-11-21 17:33 ` Juergen Urban
2009-11-21 22:04 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0587B0.3020702@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=JuergenUrban@gmx.de \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.