From: Stefan Xenon <stefanxe@gmx.net>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] different default key sizes for CREATE and LUKSFORMAT
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:40:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B07DFA5.6030303@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091121104732.GA560@tansi.org>
> Good idea, I like it. However use the same time as for the keyslots.
> There is really no reason to have one use less iterations than
> the other.
>
> The two iterations are linked security-wise, so treating them the same
> makes sense.
>
> Incidentially, it should only add the time once, there is only
> one Master Key.
Sounds good for me as well. While I don't know the details I am
wondering if the result may be influenced by other processes executed at
the same time. This means, when heavy processes are running in the
background (e.g. compilation), the iteration calculation may become
slower and thus the amount of iterations smaller as it would be
normally. Please note that I don't know the implementation details but
just want to point out this theoretical problem.
Also the possibility to recalculate the iterations might be useful,
after an upgrade of the computer (but with remaining storage device).
Especially external hard drives might be in use for more years compared
to the CPU.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-21 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-17 22:45 [dm-crypt] different default key sizes for CREATE and LUKSFORMAT Stefan Xenon
2009-11-18 5:45 ` Arno Wagner
2009-11-18 10:01 ` Stefan Xenon
2009-11-18 10:25 ` Arno Wagner
2009-11-18 11:20 ` Milan Broz
2009-11-18 13:26 ` Milan Broz
2009-11-18 15:17 ` Heinz Diehl
2009-11-19 7:41 ` Arno Wagner
2009-11-19 9:21 ` Heinz Diehl
2009-11-19 12:24 ` Arno Wagner
2009-11-19 12:28 ` Arno Wagner
2009-11-19 13:00 ` Heinz Diehl
2009-11-20 12:14 ` Milan Broz
2009-11-20 15:43 ` Heinz Diehl
2009-11-21 10:47 ` Arno Wagner
2009-11-21 12:40 ` Stefan Xenon [this message]
2009-11-21 17:26 ` Arno Wagner
2009-11-19 20:00 ` Stefan Xenon
2009-11-20 12:22 ` Milan Broz
2009-11-23 13:45 ` Roscoe
2009-11-23 14:29 ` Milan Broz
2009-11-23 15:46 ` Arno Wagner
2009-11-23 16:05 ` Heinz Diehl
2009-11-19 7:28 ` Arno Wagner
2009-11-20 12:43 ` Jonas Meurer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B07DFA5.6030303@gmx.net \
--to=stefanxe@gmx.net \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.