From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Bessai Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:18:12 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Support for Family 10h CPUs - Not all sensors are Message-Id: <4B099C84.2050706@tu-dortmund.de> List-Id: References: <232a75d96e552164f4c7073154b36172.squirrel@unimail.uni-dortmund.de> In-Reply-To: <232a75d96e552164f4c7073154b36172.squirrel@unimail.uni-dortmund.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Jean Delvare wrote: >> Linux should not lack temperature sensor support for such popular >> Processors. >> > > This is a pointless statement, I hope you realize it. There are a lot > of things that should not be, but are still, for various reasons. Want > an example? A big company such as AMD shouldn't have released millions > of CPUs with broken thermal sensors. As it stands, we do what we can to > cope with their mistake. Pardon, this was meant to be an argument for adding the drivers - without any critical intention. I appreciate your work, I see that it was AMD who released broken products and I just wanted to give a reason for not dropping support for the complete k10 cpu family. _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors