Re: Is this nf_conn "use" counter bug???

[Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>]

Patrick McHardy wrote:
> kendo wrote:
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "kendo" <kendo999@sohu.com>
>> To: "Patrick McHardy" <kaber@trash.net>
>> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 7:12 PM
>> Subject: Re: Is this nf_conn "use" counter bug???
>>
>>
>>>> This code looks like from the 2.4 era.
>>> ----I'm sorry, I copy from 2.6.12,not 2.6.30.9.Because I also opened up them.
>>>
>>>> Most likely there's an skb leak somewhere and the conntrack references
>>>> are not released.
>>> ----Yes, I think so.But why is that so??kfree_skb function has not been properly invoked when skb leave?
> 
> Possibly. You can check the skbuff caches in /proc/slabinfo to see
> whether this is the case.
> 
>>>>> Environment:
>>>>> -----internet--cisco switch (two port bonding)-----linux box(two bridge)----cisco switch(two port bonging)---server
>>>>>
>>>>> Cisco switch link aggregation，use two port.Linux box have two Independent network bridge.
>>>                                           (ge0/1) ---------------(eth0) (eth1)------------(ge1/0/1)
>>> ---interface-----cisco switch 1                           linux box                           cisco switch 2--------servers
>>>                                           (ge0/2)----------------(eth2) (eth3)------------(ge1/0/1)
>>>
>>> switch 1:
>>> port 0/1 and port 0/2 link aggregation
>>>
>>> switch 2:
>>> port 1/0/1 and port 1/0/2 link aggregation
> 
> So you're bridging two ports which are connected to aggregated links?
> What is the purpose of doing this?

Ah I see this was a misunderstanding.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html