From: Oren Laadan <orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] powerpc: catch 32/64bit mix
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:32:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0D9468.3050606@cs.columbia.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091125191617.GA11814-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org):
>> I can't recall a convincing reason why restore_{thread,cpu}() should
>> run so late, or in particular after restore_task_objs().
>>
>> I think the original motivation was to avoid the point-of-no-return
>> at a very early stage. However this is only useful for self-restart.
>>
>> If we ever want self-restart to fail gracefully should something go
>> wrong, we should be prepared to undo any changes to the process -
>> on the error path. While not beyond reach, it isn't a top priority.
>>
>> Does calling restore_{thread,cpu}() earlier solve the problem ?
>
> Yes, it does.
>
>> BTW, this is also relevant for x86-64...
>
> and also 31-bit s390
Excellent. Then I'll change the order for v19-rc2.
Thanks,
Oren.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-25 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-25 16:22 [PATCH RFC] powerpc: catch 32/64bit mix Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20091125162250.GA9034-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 19:03 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4B0D7F96.6050100-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 19:16 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20091125191617.GA11814-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 20:32 ` Oren Laadan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0D9468.3050606@cs.columbia.edu \
--to=orenl-eqauephvms7envbuuze7ea@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.