From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1NEW1L-0001bF-0r for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:44:03 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NEW1I-0001aF-Rr for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:44:00 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NEW1E-0001Y3-5q for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:44:00 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48179 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NEW1E-0001Xy-2O for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:43:56 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f178.google.com ([209.85.221.178]:54400) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NEW1D-0007do-Pd for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:43:55 -0500 Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so1136500qyk.24 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:43:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WboddBzD9czq7MrQwUhsEJ08mx389ebNo1Z1/ne5Bq0=; b=xo35+IojMAr48SCkbPTCklqko5OflY8UoYAz8nbDaSlUB4USEM7vPpTjbbrG2PFuP5 0gBgLbRQu7F+cpbiLhzkpFPcRKzmkR/azOg5aZ8rIaLpoK7/Ca3C2qxe6jgc/5cpvhxQ Kj9uMygJoB1wFojFDaQSaADTLvK7kBjyN3ev4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tzyYwOzMqlqfLXC3sj4NzbViGB7XLUSkCcviGcO7goKBoLzRq2zVRi4kHMGD7WFEFc yVhOM9l6+t11mcOpNFjM95RaIB0oLj6PwKnKxxwSkRnYTM3wneHsIOYIu7ANBx/VnRsE Qv6MSYjVMepNenpDzFG0RRE5P2oq/XzgIzsn0= Received: by 10.224.34.230 with SMTP id m38mr1277701qad.284.1259448235126; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:43:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.5? (c-24-128-82-101.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.128.82.101]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm2413636qyk.3.2009.11.28.14.43.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:43:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B11A7A8.9010404@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:43:52 -0500 From: Qianqian Fang User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB References: <4B0E062F.6000000@gmail.com> <1259226689.2847.3.camel@fz.local> <4B0E9E51.4090803@gmail.com> <4B0F21C8.3@gmail.com> <4B108113.5010407@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Subject: Re: fonts for gfxmenu, help needed X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:44:01 -0000 Michal Suchanek wrote: > Given the 1-bit bitmap limitation most glyphs look pretty good but the > 灱 glyph just above the UmingCN title in the taskbar is particularly > ugly. Is this an expected limitation of this rendering method that > some glyphs simply turn out ugly or is this a bug in the font? > ok, now I see which glyph you were talking about. No, to me, "灱" is not particularly ugly. It has comparable quality to others. They are definitely sub-optimal compared with the manually hinted bitmaps, but they are usable for this size.