From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1NEmQ3-0004uH-5l for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:14:39 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NEmQ1-0004qx-2u for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:14:37 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NEmPw-0004mh-FQ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:14:36 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44755 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NEmPw-0004mU-6W for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:14:32 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f178.google.com ([209.85.221.178]:49869) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NEmPv-0005Oi-V8 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:14:32 -0500 Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so1290320qyk.24 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:14:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ygPeopjg/ywS/nlO7kvGsHRQJnnAyg5LfQBh1k8IHiw=; b=vNYV9xCnf6K4b66PXzVCerHhF+802NRdAsa2o7DVnBIUB6GRj/UoXUjEQzOhWKogqv rGWoC5hO/wp8CxhGvjSpeus43NV/ppxgxC0aEpD4lQfK3uJniJ/vnyiaivU0yJsq486f uGpt4jCj5ztN6wA4V/Fp1F2preRVjIHm1kuak= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Zj6WEQ7aJ6QYYiOpVdFNuLPbreHYKckQqW9+5YOjkARF2h+6dKDfTVJMHAvAeRnA2z OsprX3cPa40n4dusOGdxE3xokG4kvBsfs+GQL8lNiYifJnHrOduEIB+kBASp3E41z34L bnPIG4lKM/Gh+cBNoqj6Waq9xqqHupllRoWbs= Received: by 10.224.16.131 with SMTP id o3mr1619615qaa.18.1259511270707; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:14:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.5? (c-24-128-82-101.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.128.82.101]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm9102685qwd.56.2009.11.29.08.14.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:14:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B129DE3.6010009@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:14:27 -0500 From: Qianqian Fang User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB References: <4B0E062F.6000000@gmail.com> <1259226689.2847.3.camel@fz.local> <4B0E9E51.4090803@gmail.com> <4B0F21C8.3@gmail.com> <4B108113.5010407@gmail.com> <4B11A7A8.9010404@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Subject: Re: fonts for gfxmenu, help needed X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:14:37 -0000 Michal Suchanek wrote: > It's good enough to read the character but if I designed a theme with > this character in some large caption I would immediately start looking > for a font that has a decent glyph for this character. It's far from > nice to look at. > I was talking about "rasterization quality", do you mean the aesthetics of the glyph topology/structure? However, I am pretty sure you don't need to worry about "灱" because it is an extremely rarely used character and was only used in ancient literatures. As a matter of fact, in the over 20,000 Han char. included in the fonts I mentioned, the top 3,000~4,000 covers 99.6% of the use in modern Chinese [1]. [1] http://www.jiyili.net/thread-27521-1-1.html (based on a national survey in 1980s) > Thanks > > Michal > > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel > >