From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, fubar@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] bonding: allow arp_ip_targets to be on a separate vlan from bond device
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:22:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B142989.6070207@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091130201453.GF1639@gospo.rdu.redhat.com>
Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
> index e75a2f3..8d8a778 100644
> --- a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
> +++ b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ int __vlan_hwaccel_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct vlan_group *grp,
> if (skb_bond_should_drop(skb))
> goto drop;
>
> + skb->skb_iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
> __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, vlan_tci);
> skb->dev = vlan_group_get_device(grp, vlan_tci & VLAN_VID_MASK);
>
> @@ -85,6 +86,7 @@ vlan_gro_common(struct napi_struct *napi, struct vlan_group *grp,
> if (skb_bond_should_drop(skb))
> goto drop;
>
> + skb->skb_iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
> __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, vlan_tci);
> skb->dev = vlan_group_get_device(grp, vlan_tci & VLAN_VID_MASK);
>
How about pulling the skb->iif assignment in netif_receive_skb() up
before the vlan_hwaccel_do_receive() call instead? I'd actually call
this a bug fix since hardware accelerated devices should not differ
from non-accelerated devices in their iif value.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-30 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-30 20:14 [PATCH net-next-2.6] bonding: allow arp_ip_targets to be on a separate vlan from bond device Andy Gospodarek
2009-11-30 20:22 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-11-30 20:53 ` Andy Gospodarek
2009-12-01 9:42 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-12-01 0:00 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-12-01 1:21 ` Andy Gospodarek
2009-12-01 1:57 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-12-01 14:44 ` Andy Gospodarek
2009-12-01 21:28 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-12-01 23:07 ` Andy Gospodarek
2009-12-02 21:24 ` Andy Gospodarek
2009-12-07 18:13 ` Andy Gospodarek
2009-12-07 18:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-09 22:01 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 v3] bonding: allow arp_ip_targets on separate vlans to use arp validation Andy Gospodarek
2009-12-11 5:17 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-12-14 20:48 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 v4] " Andy Gospodarek
2009-12-26 2:22 ` David Miller
2009-12-28 15:26 ` Andy Gospodarek
2009-12-28 15:33 ` David Miller
2009-12-28 21:55 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-12-29 0:51 ` Andy Gospodarek
2010-01-04 5:19 ` David Miller
2009-12-01 4:11 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] bonding: allow arp_ip_targets to be on a separate vlan from bond device Eric Dumazet
2009-12-02 5:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-02 16:38 ` Andy Gospodarek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B142989.6070207@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.