From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andres Lagar-Cavilla Subject: Re: libxenlight or libxenheavy? Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:27:57 -0500 Message-ID: <4B1527ED.2000903@lagarcavilla.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Vincent Hanquez , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org I think 3/14 (8mb slack) is a non-issue because no real memory is allocated. Perhaps a confussion due to the patch description. I'll see what I can do about 7/14 (no dm for pv). Later today. As well as Stefano's comments on 1/14 which should allow 2/14 as well Andres Keir Fraser wrote: > Too late. Issues will have to be fixed up in followup patches. > > -- Keir > > On 01/12/2009 14:00, "Stefano Stabellini" > wrote: > > >> I would not apply also 3/14 and 7/14 because of Vincent's comments. >> >> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Keir Fraser wrote: >> >>> Applied all but patch 2/14, of the below list. It depended on patch 1/14 >>> which was nacked. All others I list below are applied as of c/s 20538. >>> >>> -- Keir >>> >>> > > >