From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4B167B4B.3010804@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:35:55 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4B1663B9.8030306@domain.hid> <4B166A5B.6030400@domain.hid> <4B166EFB.8050309@domain.hid> <4B16769A.9060700@domain.hid> <4B167A55.8080407@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4B167A55.8080407@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Realtime gettimeofday() List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Wolfgang Mauerer , "xenomai@xenomai.org" Jan Kiszka wrote: > Why? It delivers us the core mechanism we need for the rest as well - > and it does not require fancy I-pipe hooks. Because relying on the vdso/vsyscall only works on x86. Whereas implementing clock slew down/acceleration at nucleus level and simply sharing data between kernel and user through the the global sem heap, works for all architectures. -- Gilles