Re: [Patch 1/1] CLD: forgot FD_ZERO in test/large-object.c

[Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>]

On 12/02/2009 08:53 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Signed-Off-By: Pete Zaitcev<zaitcev@redhat.com>
> ---
>   test/large-object.c |    1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/test/large-object.c b/test/large-object.c
> index f0884b8..fbed9b7 100644
> --- a/test/large-object.c
> +++ b/test/large-object.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ static bool send_buf(struct st_client *stc, int sfd, void *buf, size_t buf_len)
>   	while (buf_len) {
>   		FD_ZERO(&wset);
>   		FD_SET(sfd,&wset);
> +		FD_ZERO(&rset);
>   		FD_SET(sfd,&rset);
>   		rc = select(sfd + 1,&rset,&wset, NULL, NULL);
>   		OK(rc>= 0);

applied to chunkd ($subject indicated cld)

This is one of the many reasons why I prefer poll(2).  One record per 
poll entry, which is quite convenient for small numbers of fd's.

	Jeff