From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
randy.dunlap@oracle.com, wcohen@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, jbaron@redhat.com,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: trace/events: DECLARE vs DEFINE semantic
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:51:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B17C25A.8090703@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1259813228.12870.108.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 23:00 -0500, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> In addition, I wonder if we should rename "CREATE_TRACE_POINTS" to
>>> something more suitable while we are here ? Basically, it will affect
>>> all TRACE_CLASS/TRACE_CLASS_EVENT/TRACE_EVENT from headers included
>>> after it's defined.
>>
>> Agreed, CREATE_TRACE_POINTS is a bit irritating thing :-(
>
> Well, I think the name could use some help, but I don't think it is the
> name that irritates you.
Yes :-)
>> For example, if we call tracepoints defined in same-header on
>> several different files, we need to check other people have
>> already defined CREATE_TRACE_POINTS on another file, because
>> CREATE_TRACE_POINTS must be used once for each header...
>>
>> So, how about introducing a c file which is only for defining
>> tracepoints for kernel parts ? or defining tracepoints in
>> kernel at the beginning of kernel/tracepoint.c ? (and don't
>> touch tracepoints in modules)
>
> I think the proper fix is to have each tracepoint header have its own C
> file. I believe Christoph does this with xfs.
>
> Basically, we should have a:
>
> kernel/sched_trace.c that includes the include/trace/events/sched.h and
> does the define.
>
> And the same goes for other trace points.
Hmm, I'd rather like to move it into kernel/events/ or something new
sub directory, since those files will have just two lines (define and
include).
>> e.g.
>>
>> @kernel/tracepoint.c
>> ...
>> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>> #include <trace/events/sched.h>
>> #include <trace/events/...>
>
> We could do this for all that is defined in the include/trace/events.
>
>> ...
>>
>> @kernel/sched.c
>> ...
>> #include <trace/events/sched.h> /* Just include events header */
>> ...
>>
>> @fs/ext4/super.c (no change, since it can be module)
>> ...
>> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>> #include <trace/events/ext4.h>
>
> Perhaps we should move out anything in include/trace/events that is also
> a module into its sub system?
Would you mean putting those headers in sub-system's directory?
(e.g. fs/ext4/)
In that case, a problem will happen when user want to hook those
tracepoint from their module, because it is hard to find those
local headers.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-03 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-01 17:18 [PATCH v2] tracing: add DEFINE_EVENT(), DEFINE_SINGLE_EVENT() support to docbook Jason Baron
2009-12-01 17:20 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-12-02 10:42 ` [tip:perf/core] tracing: Add " tip-bot for Jason Baron
2009-12-02 13:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 14:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-02 14:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 14:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-02 14:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 16:15 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-12-02 16:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-02 17:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 18:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-02 18:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 19:01 ` trace/events: DECLARE vs DEFINE semantic Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-02 19:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 19:34 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-12-02 22:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-02 22:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 22:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-02 23:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-02 23:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 23:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-02 23:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-03 3:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-02 23:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-03 4:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-03 4:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-03 13:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2009-12-03 13:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-03 14:09 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-03 14:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-03 14:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-03 15:31 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-03 15:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-03 16:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-02 20:11 ` [PATCH][tip/perf/core] tracing: Rename TRACE_EVENT and others to something resonable Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 20:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B17C25A.8090703@redhat.com \
--to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.