From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: Production Use of the PV OPS Kernel
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:48:30 -0800
Message-ID: <4B192F4E.4010100@goop.org>
References: <C73EBE43.3A98%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <C73EBE43.3A98%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Anthony Wright <anthony@overnetdata.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 12/04/09 05:25, Keir Fraser wrote:
> 4.0 should release in January, and pv_ops should be fine for dom0 and domU
> use at that time. Possibly we will need a 'very stable' branch in the pv_ops
> tree so that we can really get things stabilised at the same time as the
> xen-unstable tree.
>    

Yes.  I'll probably just follow the mainline stable kernel pattern (ie, 
maintain stable-2.6.x for as long as the upstream stable-2.6.x is 
maintained).

     J