All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: AER/hotplug _OSC wierdness?
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 21:55:49 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B1C7CC5.5070709@gmail.com> (raw)

I've been looking into why I get these messages on bootup on an Asus 
P7P55D PRO motherboard:

Firmware did not grant requested _OSC control
aer 0000:00:03.0:pcie02: AER service couldn't init device: no _OSC support
pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5
Firmware did not grant requested _OSC control
Firmware did not grant requested _OSC control
Firmware did not grant requested _OSC control
Firmware did not grant requested _OSC control

The AML code for _OSC in the DSDT (below) is almost identical to the 
example code in the ACPI spec. From looking at the _OSC method, I don't 
see why it should reject any requests for PCI Express hotplug or AER 
control.

I can't quite make sense of the ACPI code that is supposed to handle 
this. When the AER driver calls acpi_pci_osc_control_set, it first does 
this:

	/* Need to query controls first before requesting them */
	if (!root->osc_queried) {
		status = acpi_pci_query_osc(root, root->osc_support_set);
		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
			goto out;
	}
	if ((root->osc_control_qry & control_req) != control_req) {
		printk(KERN_DEBUG
		       "Firmware did not grant requested _OSC control\n");
		status = AE_SUPPORT;
		goto out;
	}

Inside acpi_pci_query_osc:

	/* do _OSC query for all possible controls */
	support_set = root->osc_support_set | (flags & OSC_SUPPORT_MASKS);
	capbuf[OSC_QUERY_TYPE] = OSC_QUERY_ENABLE;
	capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_TYPE] = support_set;
	capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_TYPE] = OSC_CONTROL_MASKS;

	status = acpi_pci_run_osc(root->device->handle, capbuf, &result);
	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
		root->osc_support_set = support_set;
		root->osc_control_qry = result;
		root->osc_queried = 1;
	}

The comment says "do _OSC query for all possible controls", but it 
doesn't look like that's what the code is actually doing. The first time 
this gets called, assuming osc_support_set is 0, it looks like 
support_set passed into _OSC will also be 0. Then osc_queried would be 
set to 1, _OSC would never get called again and the cached query result 
is based on 0 support flags being passed into _OSC, which is wrong. Or 
am I missing something?

     Name (PEHP, One)
     Name (SHPC, Zero)
     Name (PEPM, One)
     Name (PEER, One)
     Name (PECS, One)

...

         Method (_OSC, 4, NotSerialized)
         {
             Name (SUPP, Zero)
             Name (CTRL, Zero)
             CreateDWordField (Arg3, Zero, CDW1)
             CreateDWordField (Arg3, 0x04, CDW2)
             CreateDWordField (Arg3, 0x08, CDW3)
             If (LEqual (Arg0, Buffer (0x10)
                     {
                         /* 0000 */    0x5B, 0x4D, 0xDB, 0x33, 0xF7, 
0x1F, 0x1C, 0x40,
                         /* 0008 */    0x96, 0x57, 0x74, 0x41, 0xC0, 
0x3D, 0xD7, 0x66
                     }))
             {
                 Store (CDW2, SUPP)
                 Store (CDW3, CTRL)
                 If (LNotEqual (And (SUPP, 0x16), 0x16))
                 {
                     And (CTRL, 0x1E, CTRL)
                 }

                 If (LNot (PEHP))
                 {
                     And (CTRL, 0x1E, CTRL)
                 }

                 If (LNot (SHPC))
                 {
                     And (CTRL, 0x1D, CTRL)
                 }

                 If (LNot (PEPM))
                 {
                     And (CTRL, 0x1B, CTRL)
                 }

                 If (LNot (PEER))
                 {
                     And (CTRL, 0x15, CTRL)
                 }

                 If (LNot (PECS))
                 {
                     And (CTRL, 0x0F, CTRL)
                 }

                 If (Not (And (CDW1, One)))
                 {
                     If (And (CTRL, One)) {}
                     If (And (CTRL, 0x04)) {}
                     If (And (CTRL, 0x10)) {}
                 }

                 If (LNotEqual (Arg1, One))
                 {
                     Or (CDW1, 0x08, CDW1)
                 }

                 If (LNotEqual (CDW3, CTRL))
                 {
                     Or (CDW1, 0x10, CDW1)
                 }

                 And (CTRL, 0xEF, CTRL)
                 Store (CTRL, CDW3)
                 Return (Arg3)
             }
             Else
             {
                 Or (CDW1, 0x04, CDW1)
                 Return (Arg3)
             }
         }


             reply	other threads:[~2009-12-07  3:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-07  3:55 Robert Hancock [this message]
2009-12-07  9:26 ` AER/hotplug _OSC wierdness? Kenji Kaneshige
2009-12-08  2:37   ` Robert Hancock
2009-12-07 10:55 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-12-08  2:57   ` Robert Hancock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B1C7CC5.5070709@gmail.com \
    --to=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.