From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1NHmgc-0003OB-OW for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:08:10 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NHmga-0003K2-G0 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:08:08 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NHmgV-0003De-Ig for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:08:07 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41009 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NHmgV-0003Bq-CN for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:08:03 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f196.google.com ([209.85.211.196]:36036) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NHmgU-0000j3-25 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:08:02 -0500 Received: by ywh34 with SMTP id 34so4736650ywh.1 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:07:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5JJUCYb/Gkhcmtay0ZV16jp6nAxsKKMu+B99qd4kDpE=; b=bFVKoTUFZt6DGgExl6g9B8JlgWoLXQOnYJK6u9fZ8iApM9T9mS3BUpNXb3RJzseUH7 hqC99bQXZ8XfcL9bmW5wOlrYeLSRMnSRlp7LjAorwe7BMDpYISBGcHehQ0FnfvmrW9pI A19K96QYtCaG3o2Tvx/wqw1UlYFwt51DX5AFc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aVeLwXHvJGcZahikKwfx0WXA2aIPRIrxHU5CL6Qzgi6cYa9HlvZ7Ft1OXcxxxIqs7R zUbGoK1hSxnaNXidqMTFpo/OQFdGmeenu/yPvYSXj31RR5Y1bFYo4R02YDTrLFxCsXrb TyOyqWlBimBCbVOU2a0BbfKLmk4bVI3gD8KUI= Received: by 10.101.129.31 with SMTP id g31mr6371579ann.153.1260227279050; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:07:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.75? (cpe-66-69-97-231.satx.res.rr.com [66.69.97.231]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 35sm2743162yxh.51.2009.12.07.15.07.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:07:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B1D8ACD.3060402@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:07:57 -0600 From: Bruce Dubbs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080722 SeaMonkey/1.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB References: <4B1D3D7E.5000909@gmail.com> <20091207192128.GG6439@riva.ucam.org> <4B1D6563.3000807@gmail.com> <4B1D7DC6.6070604@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4B1D7DC6.6070604@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Subject: Re: autogen.sh warnings X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:08:08 -0000 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> I'm not sure GRUB uses or needs the output of config.rpath. I was >> just suppressing a warning. > Just suppressing warning is a wrong approach. If warning is there it > usually means there is a reason for it. And the reason should be > corrected, we shouldn't just silence the warning. It's better to leave > the warning if you're unsure how to fix its reason. I agree. Please see my follow on message I sent a few minutes ago. The underlying reason for the warning is using automake for a side effect and not its intended purpose. -- Bruce