From: Julian Scheel <julian@jusst.de>
To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New DVB(!!)-Statistics API
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:24:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B1E4587.3070304@jusst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B1E1974.6000207@jusst.de>
Am 08.12.09 10:16, schrieb Julian Scheel:
> Hello together,
>
> after the last thread which asked about signal statistics details
> degenerated into a discussion about the technical possibilites for
> implementing an entirely new API, which lead to nothing so far, I
> wanted to open a new thread to bring this forward. Maybe some more
> people can give their votes for the different options
>
> Actually Manu did propose a new API for fetching enhanced statistics.
> It uses new IOCTL to directly fetch the statistical data in one go
> from the frontend. This propose was so far rejected by Mauro who wants
> to use the S2API get/set calls instead.
>
> Now to give everyone a quick overview about the advantages and
> disadvantages of both approaches I will try to summarize it up:
>
> 1st approach: Introduce new IOCTL
>
> Pros:
> - Allows a quick fetch of the entire dataset, which ensures that:
> 1. all values are fetched in one go (as long as possible) from the
> frontend, so that they can be treated as one united and be valued in
> conjunction
> 2. the requested values arrive the caller in an almost constant
> timeframe, as the ioctl is directly executed by the driver
> - It does not interfere with the existing statistics API, which has to
> be kept alive as it is in use for a long time already. (unifying it's
> data is not the approach of this new API)
>
> Cons:
> - Forces the application developers to interact with two APIs. The
> S2API for tuning on the one hand and the Statistics API for reading
> signal values on the other hand.
>
> 2nd approach: Set up S2API calls for reading statistics
>
> Pros:
> - Continous unification of the linuxtv API, allowing all calls to be
> made through one API. -> easy for application developers
>
> Cons:
> - Due to the key/value pairs used for S2API getters the statistical
> values can't be read as a unique block, so we loose the guarantee,
> that all of the values can be treatend as one unit expressing the
> signals state at a concrete time.
> - Due to the general architecture of the S2API the delay between
> requesting and receiving the actual data could become too big to allow
> realtime interpretation of the data (as it is needed for applications
> like satellite finders, etc.)
>
> I hope that this summary is technically correct in all points, if not
> I'd be thankful for objective corrections. I am not going to
> articulate my personal opinion in this mail, but I will do it in
> another mail in reply to this one, so that this mail can be seen as a
> neutral summary of the current situation.
>
> So now it's everyones turn to think about the options and give an
> opinion. In the end I am quite sure that all of us would have great
> benefits of an improved statistics API.
>
> Cheers,
> Julian
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
The above mail of course has nothing to do with USB-Statistics. I must
have been slightly confused when typing the message title! Sorry for that!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-08 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-08 9:16 New USB-Statistics API Julian Scheel
2009-12-08 12:24 ` Julian Scheel [this message]
2009-12-08 13:22 ` New DVB-Statistics API Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-12-08 21:46 ` Manu Abraham
2009-12-08 23:43 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-12-09 11:42 ` Manu Abraham
2009-12-09 13:02 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-12-09 22:12 ` Julian Scheel
2009-12-09 23:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-02-03 9:49 ` New DVB-Statistics API - please vote Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-02-03 10:40 ` Hans Verkuil
2010-02-03 12:37 ` Manu Abraham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B1E4587.3070304@jusst.de \
--to=julian@jusst.de \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.