From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Dan Merillat <dan.merillat@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>,
Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>,
Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar@sdinet.de>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.31 - very swap-happy with plenty of free RAM
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:18:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B201428.9060701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091209204803.GD29575@khazad-dum.debian.net>
On 12/09/2009 03:48 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, Dan Merillat wrote:
>>>> Can you try out the patch from
>>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/25/467 ?
>>
>> After a week of testing, that seems to have been the issue, thanks!
>
> In that case, is that patch being considered for stable@ ?
That may be an option, after Andrew has submitted the patch
to Linus for 2.6.33, which he typically does towards the end
of the merge window.
I will certainly ask the Fedora kernel maintainers to take
the patch in for their 2.6.32 based kernel.
--
All rights reversed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-09 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-05 1:16 complete IO hang since a few kernel revision Norbert Preining
2009-10-05 2:57 ` Ulrich Lukas
2009-10-05 8:33 ` Norbert Preining
2009-10-06 2:00 ` Robert Hancock
2009-10-06 2:05 ` Norbert Preining
2009-10-06 7:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-06 7:16 ` Norbert Preining
2009-10-06 7:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-10 19:06 ` Petr Titěra
2009-11-18 7:56 ` Linux 2.6.31 - very swap-happy with plenty of free RAM Dan Merillat
2009-11-18 15:22 ` Rik van Riel
2009-11-18 15:48 ` Norbert Preining
2009-11-19 14:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-25 23:13 ` Dan Merillat
2009-11-26 1:54 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-03 4:16 ` Dan Merillat
2009-12-07 20:49 ` Dan Merillat
2009-12-09 20:48 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-12-09 21:18 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-18 21:45 Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-11-19 0:40 ` Dan Merillat
2009-11-19 1:09 ` Sven-Haegar Koch
2009-11-19 1:38 ` Dave Chinner
2009-11-19 6:43 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-11-23 21:57 ` Dan Merillat
2009-11-27 1:56 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B201428.9060701@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.merillat@gmail.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=haegar@sdinet.de \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=preining@logic.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.