From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NJ1S6-00059A-Tb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:06:18 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NJ1S2-00050k-7I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:06:18 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58064 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NJ1S2-00050g-4d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:06:14 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41639) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NJ1S1-0008AB-Ut for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:06:14 -0500 Message-ID: <4B220B3A.1060702@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:04:58 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] raw: Use the right host device driver for open/create References: <1259596471-14576-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <20091130205120.GA6053@lst.de> <4B18CAC0.2080400@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4B18CAC0.2080400@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org So the proposed patch is too hacky, but nobody likes to discuss what the right way is? What about 0.12? Are we just going to provide the current bad user interface? Kevin