From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4B264295.9080308@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:50:13 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4B263E6A.7040104@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4B263E6A.7040104@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Build tests. List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: Alexis Berlemont , xenomai-core Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on automated build tests of several configurations of > Xenomai head. While running them, I found a few issues, and would need > acks, since it is in parts others maintain. > > Alex: https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-git/2009-12/msg00112.html > > Wolfgang: https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-git/2009-12/msg00113.html > Though I'm not Wolfgang: config XENO_DRIVERS_CAN_SJA1000_PEAK_DNG - depends on XENO_DRIVERS_CAN_SJA1000 + depends on XENO_DRIVERS_CAN_SJA1000 && !PARPORT tristate "PEAK Parallel Port Dongle" help That's not obviously related. Why do we need it? > Anyone: https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-git/2009-12/msg00114.html > If it builds, it's fine (I don't think anyone is using x86 on 2.4 anymore). > Philippe (check powerpc 2.4): > https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-git/2009-12/msg00115.html > > The current status of the tests may be found here: > http://sisyphus.hd.free.fr/~gilles/bx/ Nice! That's not buildbot-based, is it? Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux