From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Goirand Subject: Re: HVM support to be removed from Debian Squeeze: call for volunteers Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:07:16 +0800 Message-ID: <4B27D054.2010007@goirand.fr> References: <4B2717A1.2030503@goirand.fr> <19239.43841.305068.90197@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <4B27C46B.3080504@goirand.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Cc: Debian Xen Team , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Yes, there is. > As a matter of fact we package qemu-xen in its own rpm on XCP, called > xen-device-model. > The qemu-xen XCP tree is available as a patchqueue against CS > 284d056851f7 of qemu-xen-unstable.hg here: > > http://xenbits.xen.org/xapi/qemu-xen-3.4.pq.hg > > you might be interested in the spec file: mk/xen-device-model.spec.in. > > However I don't suggest using the qemu-xen XCP tree because the last few > patches in the patchqueue require changes in the toolstack or other > patches in the xen tree available on XCP but not available on plain > unpatched systems. Our target should be Xen 3.4 in Debian, ATM. If you don't suggest to use the qemu from XCP, which one should I use? Do you think we should call the Debian package xen-device-model as well (and not xen-hvm-support as I suggested...)? Thomas P.S: Form now on, I'll be writing only to the xen-devel@l.x.com list for this thread, please do the same for future messages.