All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Madru <jdm64@gawab.com>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: s5k3e2fx.c: reduce complexity by factoring
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:37:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B27D756.4050102@gawab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c0942db0912142002p638a187araa837812862e5b17@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/14/2009 08:02 PM, Ray Lee wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Justin Madru<jdm64@gawab.com>  wrote:
>    
>> I was style fixing some code when I ran into this code.
>> It seems like the code could be reduced, by factoring the expression.
>> But this results in a very simple expression.
>>
>> Am I assuming something wrong? Or is this a bug in the original code?
>> This doesn't look right because the assignment of s_move[i] has no mention
>> of the loop counter.
>>      
> Algebraic factoring is not valid in general when dealing with pure
> integer expressions that may contain rounding issues. I haven't
> checked to see if that's the case with the code you're changing, but
> that sort of expression you're removing is very commonly used exactly
> to deal with rounding issues.
>    

I know that's true and that's why I was questioning if my patch actually 
removed a necessary calculation.
But, wouldn't you agree that if the code was suppose to deal with 
"rounding issues" that there's a
simpler expression?

Justin

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-15 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-06  2:03 [PATCH] staging: s5k3e2fx.c: reduce complexity by factoring Justin Madru
2009-12-09  9:57 ` Dan Carpenter
2009-12-15  0:38   ` Justin Madru
2009-12-15  0:47     ` Greg KH
2009-12-15  4:02 ` Ray Lee
2009-12-15 18:37   ` Justin Madru [this message]
2009-12-15 19:10     ` Ray Lee
2009-12-15 20:57       ` Justin Madru

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B27D756.4050102@gawab.com \
    --to=jdm64@gawab.com \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.