From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [Patch 1/1] tabled: Add replication daemon Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:14:05 -0500 Message-ID: <4B28264D.7070604@garzik.org> References: <20091126193923.088ff34c@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=etlqybJX5OOGHoCIocTVvrMMI0lto87GI/Pu66UFb0w=; b=pycxBySKoSr5LWTOzcU4KScXi0MjnQ89kSBzZ6ltd+wP9nwVNARFhNFGhuQNRohFO/ hgRowxFzdP3GlDO+/dy3IpAH2MGecYAQguwZI87cb2grfbcQ+lQeZJwKaWp1lqBE70s6 YDbrV+NvT9z0oZT/+qG4NVAIC/AxfG3v5D9tY= In-Reply-To: <20091126193923.088ff34c@redhat.com> Sender: hail-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: Project Hail List On 11/26/2009 09:39 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > This patch adds what amounts to a background process that maintains > redundancy for object data. It is far from the complete solution. > For one thing, it does not verify checksums. But it's a start. > > There's no way to turn this off, by intention. The whole thing must > work very reliably, not steal too much from benchmarks (but if it > does, it's only honest to take the hit). It is indispensible. > However, there's a plan to add useful monitoring of jobs and other > state, such as available nodes. > > This implementation uses a separate thread. > > Signed-off-by: Pete Zaitcev applied, after fixing event_reinit() and comment bugs