From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Adjust KVM_VCPUEVENT flag names Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:59:40 +0200 Message-ID: <4B28AF8C.30701@redhat.com> References: <4B1BE216.2090407@web.de> <4B1BE452.6090107@redhat.com> <4B1BE60D.5070107@web.de> <4B27A32F.7030302@redhat.com> <4B27BC55.4070606@web.de> <4B27C27F.9090504@redhat.com> <4B281446.7020903@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , kvm , Gleb Natapov To: Jan Kiszka Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51197 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754876AbZLPJ7m (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:59:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B281446.7020903@web.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/16/2009 12:57 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > They are also used on KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS, so 'VALID' is a better name > element than 'SET'. > > Thanks - applied and queued. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function