From: Josua Dietze <digidietze@draisberghof.de>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Cc: Matthew Dharm <mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net>,
Stefan Seyfried <stefan.seyfried@googlemail.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net,
Stefan Seyfried <seife@sphairon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] move eject code from zd1211rw to usb-storage
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:42:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B28C798.502@draisberghof.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200912161129.27284.oliver@neukum.org>
Oliver Neukum schrieb:
> Am Dienstag, 15. Dezember 2009 19:03:00 schrieb Matthew Dharm:
>>> This would break existing systems and thus introduce a regression.
>>> We'd need to go through a feature removal process. For the time being
>>> I see no alternative to Seife's patch, as we cannot introduce ejection
>>> code to another wireless driver and need to support these devices.
>> The right answer here is neither to move the eject code nor to introduce
>> more of it. New devices should be supported via userspace.
>
> Usually I would agree, but in this case the vendor reused IDs.
> The legacy kernel space switcher and user space would race.
User space can test for device/interface class (which will
supposedly change even if the IDs do not) and base it's actions on
that. It was done before.
Apart from that issue, I can see that there is a problem with a
device that has worked without "external" handling up to now.
Unfortunately, I can't think about a clean solution.
Josua
--
Man is the only creature on earth enabled to take a
warm meal while flying! Loriot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-16 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-15 12:06 [PATCH] move eject code from zd1211rw to usb-storage Stefan Seyfried
2009-12-15 12:31 ` Josua Dietze
2009-12-15 14:01 ` Stefan Seyfried
2009-12-15 14:59 ` Josua Dietze
2009-12-15 17:58 ` [usb-storage] " Matthew Dharm
2009-12-15 15:11 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-12-15 18:03 ` Matthew Dharm
2009-12-16 10:29 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-12-16 11:42 ` Josua Dietze [this message]
2009-12-16 18:03 ` Matthew Dharm
2009-12-16 19:50 ` Dan Williams
2009-12-16 19:52 ` Matthew Dharm
2009-12-17 13:02 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-12-17 13:33 ` Josua Dietze
2009-12-17 14:36 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-12-17 15:22 ` Josua Dietze
2009-12-17 18:21 ` Matthew Dharm
2009-12-16 10:49 ` Stefan Seyfried
2009-12-16 11:22 ` Josua Dietze
2009-12-16 12:14 ` Stefan Seyfried
2009-12-16 14:05 ` John W. Linville
2009-12-16 16:47 ` Dan Williams
2009-12-16 19:12 ` Matthew Dharm
2009-12-16 11:23 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-12-17 10:41 ` [usb-storage] " Daniel Drake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B28C798.502@draisberghof.de \
--to=digidietze@draisberghof.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=seife@sphairon.com \
--cc=stefan.seyfried@googlemail.com \
--cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.