From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: debugging windows guests
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:36:01 +0200
Message-ID: <4B29C341.60706@redhat.com>
References: <4B26D775.90809@macrohmasheen.com> <4B281E4A.1050608@web.de> <4B2959EA.2040200@macrohmasheen.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Raindog <raindog@macrohmasheen.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57393 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752487AbZLQFgH (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:36:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4B2959EA.2040200@macrohmasheen.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 12/17/2009 12:06 AM, Raindog wrote:
>
> Are there any advantages over stock qemu if using kvm w/out the kernel 
> module?

No.  qemu-kvm is not tested without kvm, so there may be disadvantages.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.