From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Darcy Subject: Re: a boto-works test for tabled? Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:16:55 -0500 Message-ID: <4B2BB907.3090000@redhat.com> References: <4B2B55FA.2070109@garzik.org> <4B2BA679.9020202@redhat.com> <20091218100928.1d4ce2d5@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20091218100928.1d4ce2d5@redhat.com> Sender: hail-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: Jeff Garzik , Project Hail On 12/18/2009 12:09 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > 1. I fixed the calling format issue long time ago. Mind that you have > to add a wildcard for it to work: > > ; Default port is 8081, we override it with -p 4499 in /etc/sysconfig/cld > _cld._udp IN SRV 10 50 4499 hitlain > _cld._udp IN SRV 10 50 4499 elanor > ; > ; Intel no-name experimental box, wildcard is for tabled > hitlain IN A 192.168.128.2 > IN AAAA fec0:0:0:1:0:0:c0a8:8002 > *.hitlain.zaitcev.lan. IN A 192.168.128.2 > IN AAAA fec0:0:0:1:0:0:c0a8:8002 Yes, if you're willing/able to make DNS changes then that probably works. I suggest that it's an impediment to testing in most environments. > 2. I see you using the port parameter, but when I tried that, Boto ignored > port and continued to use 80. The code formed a string URL without port > and then passed that to some HTTP libraries. That seems odd to me. Maybe it's a difference between the two calling-format methods?