From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: One question to IST stack for PV guest Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:50:53 -0800 Message-ID: <4B2BF93D.6090807@goop.org> References: <4B2BF269.5040608@goop.org> <2E9E6F5F5978EF44A8590E339E888CF90163515DCF@irsmsx503.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2E9E6F5F5978EF44A8590E339E888CF90163515DCF@irsmsx503.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Kleen, Andi" Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "Jiang, Yunhong" , Keir Fraser , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/18/2009 01:43 PM, Kleen, Andi wrote: > > >> What are the requirements here? Are these events delivered to dom0 to >> indicate that something needs attention on the machine, or are they >> delivered synchronously to whatever domain is currently running to say >> that something bad needs immediate attention? >> > Both can happen (and also some more like "something happened somewhere, Just FYI"). > They are all distingushed by different status bits. > If they're not synchronous, then why not use a normal virq event channel? J