From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: some questions about the new blktap2 module Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:06:12 -0800 Message-ID: <4B2FC724.4030602@goop.org> References: <000a01ca821c$1b993100$e538a60a@china.huawei.com> <20091221091656.GK16033@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20091221091656.GK16033@reaktio.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Cc: fanliang , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/21/2009 01:16 AM, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > Afaik blktap2 is not yet ready/working on pv_ops dom0 tree > (xen-unstable uses pv_ops dom0). > > Jeremy can possibly comment more about the status of blktap2. > =20 I've got it to the stage where I can start a domain and it can access=20 its disk, but the tapdisk process consumes 100% of the CPU and throws=20 kernel oopses when you terminate the domain... J