From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add memory hotadd to pvops dom0 Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:54:49 -0800 Message-ID: <4B313219.6030803@goop.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Jiang, Yunhong" Cc: "Brown, Len" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "konrad.wilk@oracle.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/22/2009 03:29 AM, Jiang, Yunhong wrote: > Re-submit based on Konrad's feedback. > > BTW, Jeremy, I'm not sure if we can keep the changes to drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c as internal changes, if it is un-acceptable by upstream? I remember in Xen summit, it is said acceptable to keep small xen-specific changes. > > In fact, I'm not sure if any changes to acpi stuff can be in upstream kernel, although Ke has take a lot of effort to make it cleaner. > Yes, I'm concerned about that too. It would be useful to put together a clean set of all our ACPI changes against upstream to see how it looks afresh, and see to what extent Len can bring himself to like them. J