From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4B31EB70.3090108@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:05:36 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1261560352-9120-1-git-send-email-wolfgang.mauerer@domain.hid> <1261560352-9120-3-git-send-email-wolfgang.mauerer@domain.hid> <4B31E503.8030208@domain.hid> <4B31EADB.8040305@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4B31EADB.8040305@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 2/2] Testcase for the xnvdso mechanism List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Wolfgang Mauerer Cc: "Kiszka, Jan" , "xenomai@xenomai.org" Wolfgang Mauerer wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Wolfgang Mauerer wrote: >>> This testcase checks if the value in xnvdso->features matches the >>> value of XNVDSO_FEATURES, that is, if the information is correctly >>> transferred from kernel to userland. >>> >>> Notice that the approach will fail once configurations are supported >>> that know of multiple features and implement only some of them. >>> In this case, the testcase needs to be extended accordingly >>> to check that only the expected features are present. >> Please allow to pass the value we want to check on the test command line. > > here you go. I suppose keeping XNVDSO_FEATURES as default value > unless something different is specified is okay? Yes, ok. I am fine with the two patches. -- Gilles.