All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 海藻敬之 <tkaiso@thinktube.com>
To: 8an@praha12.net
Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 4/5] ath5k: Reimplement clock rate to usec conversion
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:43:33 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B320265.7050807@thinktube.com> (raw)

Thanks, Lukas
> According to my interpretation the calculation should depend 
> on channel width (20MHz in normal mode, 40MHz in turbo mode, same for 802.11g 
> and 802.11a), not on MAC chip clocks. 
thanks, then my guess was irrelevant...
I got some improvement (even not so significant), but I might have
mislead myself at this moment .

let me show my observation during last a few days.

at first
- chip is AR5414
- I pulled down codes via git a week before and your recent patches were
applied.

then what I have observed till now was

1. stable and excellent throughput for 5GHz (with 1hop and also 2hops cases)
16Mbps(1hop) , 8Mbps(2hops)
note: testing with IBSS ad-hoc mode, 1 hop, 2hops , 3 hops..

2. still not good and unstable throughput for 2.4Ghz
thanks to your patch[3/5], [4/5], throughput was improved pretty much
but still staying around 10~15Mbps(1hop), 1Mbps~6Mbps(2hops)

without my experimental patch, 2hops throughput was
worse than the case with that patch.
( 1~2Mbps vs 1~6Mbps --> I can't say this difference is significant ) .
debugfs(rc_stats) shows minstrel reported around 85%~95 success
rate with 48/54Mbps and selected low xmit rate.

(this was the result on limited number of tests. five ~ ten times )

in my these tests, node is sitting pretty close (1m) to each other,
therefore I did not enable RTS/CTS and just counted on physical
carrier sense.

Does it seem that there still exist vulnerable part around carrier
sensing for 2.4GHz.?

anyway,
I would like to get back to this issue, again later

thanks
Taka



             reply	other threads:[~2009-12-23 11:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-23 11:43 海藻敬之 [this message]
2009-12-23 13:54 ` [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 4/5] ath5k: Reimplement clock rate to usec conversion Lukáš Turek
     [not found] <4B32B76D.3090508@thinktube.com>
2009-12-26 17:55 ` Lukáš Turek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-15 17:56 [PATCH 0/5] Setting coverage class (and ACK timeout and slot time), take two Lukáš Turek
2009-12-15 17:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] ath5k: Reimplement clock rate to usec conversion Lukáš Turek
2009-12-21 10:26   ` [ath5k-devel] " 海藻敬之
2009-12-21 12:38     ` Lukáš Turek
     [not found]       ` <4B301FE9.2020702@thinktube.com>
2009-12-22 16:08         ` Lukáš Turek
     [not found]     ` <4B2F50DD.60701@thinktube.com>
2009-12-21 12:40       ` Lukáš Turek
2009-12-21 15:08         ` Bob Copeland
2009-12-21 15:28           ` Lukáš Turek
2009-12-22  3:28             ` Bob Copeland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B320265.7050807@thinktube.com \
    --to=tkaiso@thinktube.com \
    --cc=8an@praha12.net \
    --cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.