From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Zalcman Subject: Atomicity of git-push operation. Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:51:38 +0100 Message-ID: <4B32044A.7010601@9livesdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Dec 23 13:03:30 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NNPud-0006a5-NK for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:01:56 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754430AbZLWMBv (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:01:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750942AbZLWMBv (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:01:51 -0500 Received: from cwl245.internetdsl.tpnet.pl ([83.19.119.245]:34182 "EHLO 9livesdata.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750899AbZLWMBu (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:01:50 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 605 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:01:49 EST Received: from mailhub.9livesdata.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.9livesdata.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B88B36B6FCDC for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:51:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from cezary.9livesdata.com (cezary [192.168.7.1]) by mailhub.9livesdata.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:51:35 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090625) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi, I have a simple question about "push" operation but I couldn't find an answer: is git-push (also with --tags flag) atomic ? Especially: if refs changing (during push) is atomic ? Thanks, Janek