From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:31:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B3A7524.1040900@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:31:16 +0100 From: Hannes Erven MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4B3914FB.7060008@gmail.com> <20091228212038.GB2224@maude.comedia.it> <4B3925F0.4050409@gmail.com> <20091228231158.GB16466@fancy-poultry.org> <20091229202429.GB17029@tansi.org> In-Reply-To: <20091229202429.GB17029@tansi.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] encrypted root: prevent / detect tampering with kernel / initrd List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de Arno Wagner schrieb: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:11:58AM +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote: >> "Please repeat with me: there is no way to avoid or detect backdoors if >> physical access to the machine has ever been granted." (Werner Koch on >> gnupg-users 19.02.2009 on exactly the same topic). > > I don't agree. How do you protect against e.g. a hardware key logger? You don't. -hannes