From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: andy@warmcat.com (Andy Green)
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:09:26 +0000
Subject: Ethernet / SD Boot
In-Reply-To: <20100104174046.GC14533@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <20091228224435.GA23617@sirena.org.uk>
	<4B39D439.9070909@warmcat.com>
	<20091229123348.GB5784@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<4B39FB2C.4010608@warmcat.com>
	<20091230131559.GA369@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<4B3B579E.8030105@warmcat.com>
	<20091231122727.GA5613@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<4B3CA02D.9000208@warmcat.com> <4B42169E.5040007@simtec.co.uk>
	<4B422545.2000509@warmcat.com>
	<20100104174046.GC14533@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <4B422ED6.1030306@warmcat.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 01/04/10 17:40, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 05:28:37PM +0000, Andy Green wrote:
>> Otherwise, you should study carefully the advantages you can get from
>> true SD Boot in simplifying the hardware, software engineering and
>> production / test / debrick.  It has pretty revolutionary benefits.
>
> Look, it's very obvious from every one of your replies that you think
> the sun shines out of your SD cards, it's superiour to whatever else
> people are using, and that everyone should use it.
>
> You have an answer for every argument to the contrary.

Yeah, that's normally considered a good sign for a thesis.

> Well, fine, you're entitled to that opinion.
>
> Now can we stop discussing this and move on please.

Sure.

However if anyone else is interested in help setting up with it, feel 
free to contact me direct.

-Andy