From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [Patch 2/2] tabled: add a test for larger objects Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:14:08 -0500 Message-ID: <4B4302E0.8040004@garzik.org> References: <20100105002754.6d29cd6e@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tFJvLFVd6ZxMDgehhcvHYhDe0m+x2xH+gMvpfWB2eO8=; b=r1RIDZP21QC2U4sEiSF+uDVjRRZfcyT5cjEewyX0MhHvQX0Ce/hUVrhzrv402nD+PG 75tf2lSeikeIKOJ5o27yNRob1tgs2CcID6lZEBXcfQ5BetCfNOZ9YoLmdkTfulbTRioJ byWerUMt4AxgTUguRv92+gHq2xYUZs6/C+GaY= In-Reply-To: <20100105002754.6d29cd6e@redhat.com> Sender: hail-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: Project Hail List On 01/05/2010 02:27 AM, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > Existing tests only excercised operations with relatively small objects. > It did not test pipelining of object data in sufficient degree. So, let's > have a better test case for this (large-object.c). > > We also change the existing basic-object.c to match. > > Signed-Off-By: Pete Zaitcev > > --- > test/.gitignore | 1 > test/Makefile.am | 5 - > test/basic-object.c | 13 +- > test/large-object.c | 197 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 209 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) applied. a follow-up patch that checks the checksums of the data sent/received would be nice...