From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com
	[10.5.110.13])
	by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP
	id o05JBT3P031907
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:11:29 -0500
Received: from smtp.iplink.net (smtp.iplink.net [192.139.81.186])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o05JBD6b008206
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:11:14 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.103] (unknown [206.108.5.162])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.iplink.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08548A776B4
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Tue,  5 Jan 2010 14:11:08 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4B438ECC.5000805@alteeve.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:11:08 -0500
From: Madison Kelly <linux@alteeve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [linux-lvm] What is holding back clustered snapshotting?
Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Id: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>

Hi all,

   I know that, currently, this isn't supported. Would someone be able 
to explain or point me at a place to read up on what is holding this 
feature back? What are the difficulties? Is it just a question of time, 
or are there certain technical hurdles in the way?

   Thanks for any input!

Madi