From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Rui Sousa <rui.p.m.sousa@gmail.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] conntrack event missing TCP protoinfo
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:19:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B4390B0.7090009@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201001041903.21755.rui.p.m.sousa@gmail.com>
Hi Rui,
Rui Sousa wrote:
> I believe so, but I having a hard time understanding what I'm seeing.
> AFAICT, I'm exercising the state transition sNo->sES->sES, my procedure is:
>
> PC1 -> linux router -> PC2
>
> 1. establish TCP connection between two PC's (using iperf). PC1 is the client,
> PC2 is the server.
> 2. On the router, ifdown of output interface (the interface on PC2 side)
> 3. On the router, manual destroy of connection in kernel
> 4. On the router, ifup of output interface
> 5. wait for iperf to start sending packets again. The connection between the
> endpoints is always established.
>
> Between 3 and 4 I receive a NFCT_DESTROY event (from libnetfilter_conntrack).
> During 5. I get two events, both NFCT_UPDATEs, the first with conntrack status
> CONFIRMED/SEEN_REPLY, the second with conntrack status ASSURED. Both are
> missing the TCP protoinfo. In this is my problem, the kernel correctly picked
> up the on going TCP connection but never sends enough information to
> userspace about it.
Good analysis. Since Linux kernel 2.6.30, you should see a NFCT_NEW
event (for conntracks that have been created via ctnetlink) before you
get the two NFCT_UPDATE events. The NFCT_NEW contains the TCP protocol
state.
I guess that you're using an older Linux kernel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-05 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-31 13:03 [PATCH] conntrack event missing TCP protoinfo Rui Sousa
2009-12-31 18:09 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-01-04 18:03 ` Rui Sousa
2010-01-05 19:19 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2010-01-05 20:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B4390B0.7090009@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.p.m.sousa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.