From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-gx0-f223.google.com (mail-gx0-f223.google.com [209.85.217.223]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A12B6EEA for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 07:07:25 +1100 (EST) Received: by gxk23 with SMTP id 23so20270777gxk.2 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:07:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B44ED99.3020706@billgatliff.com> Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:07:53 -0600 From: Bill Gatliff MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Create an of_i2c_gpiochip_add() References: <1262749898-19197-1-git-send-email-bgat@billgatliff.com> In-Reply-To: <1262749898-19197-1-git-send-email-bgat@billgatliff.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Bill Gatliff wrote: > This patch series creates an of_i2c_gpiochip_add() function, to allow > i2c-based GPIO expanders to work with device tree gpio specifications. > So nobody has any yays or nays on this? I was expecting at least _something_! :) Does the lack of response mean I'll be seeing these in an upcoming kernel release? I'd like to, because then I could more easily push through related updates to a few i2c device drivers that I have in my local repo. b.g. -- Bill Gatliff Embedded systems training and consulting http://billgatliff.com bgat@billgatliff.com