From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yx0-f181.google.com (mail-yx0-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E1CB6F01 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 07:30:49 +1100 (EST) Received: by yxe11 with SMTP id 11so15344618yxe.15 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:30:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B44F315.905@billgatliff.com> Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:31:17 -0600 From: Bill Gatliff MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Create an of_i2c_gpiochip_add() References: <1262749898-19197-1-git-send-email-bgat@billgatliff.com> <4B44ED99.3020706@billgatliff.com> <20100106201733.GA17857@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20100106201733.GA17857@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Wolfram Sang wrote: >> Does the lack of response mean I'll be seeing these in an upcoming >> kernel release? I'd like to, because then I could more easily push >> > > As long as nobody said "I picked it up", it will probably not. Patches > regarding GPIO sometimes need a bit of time. Also, of_platform was in the > discussion of being removed, this might complicate things, too. > Is this the right mailing list for such patches, though? b.g. -- Bill Gatliff Embedded systems training and consulting http://billgatliff.com bgat@billgatliff.com