From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Hanquez Subject: Re: Porting SPICE to Xen Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:01:39 +0000 Message-ID: <4B45BF13.1070901@eu.citrix.com> References: <6894a6470912280850v5b7ad285l6d90f213ef18da0b@mail.gmail.com> <6b7f6eb1001062033v3f80ae52t5d8b590e9d7819cc@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <6b7f6eb1001062033v3f80ae52t5d8b590e9d7819cc@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro Cc: David , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 01/07/2010 04:33 AM, Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro wrote: > If this happen, it will work with paravirtualized domUs too? Or maybe > it is only for HVM domains?! SPICE is 2 differents parts, the part that expose the PCI device to the guest and "replace" the graphic card IIRC, and the actual remote desktop protocol. at the moment the 2 are fairly intertwined, so it would only work with HVM domains [1], but depending on how the things get de-intertwined (which is something qemu people want), it might be possible to have it on PV. I wouldn't hold my breath on PV domain though. (I'm no SPICE expert however, so it take it with a grain of salt.) [1] providing all the pieces are available upstream in qemu etc.. which probably going to take a while too. -- Vincent