From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NT9is-0007ND-M9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:57:30 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NT9iq-0007Iq-HA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:57:29 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47273 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NT9iq-0007IF-7V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:57:28 -0500
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:51749)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>)
	id 1NT9ip-0004hK-MP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:57:27 -0500
Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([88.191.82.174])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>) id 1NT9il-0000WA-CF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:57:23 -0500
Message-ID: <4B46E554.7030801@aurel32.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 08:57:08 +0100
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] write option roms in pc-bios/
References: <4B337318.6080901@redhat.com>	<1261664861-15493-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>	<4B463DFC.5040505@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<4B46DF6D.7060306@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B46DF6D.7060306@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>

Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
> On 01/07/2010 09:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> This will wreak havoc on the tree since these are built by default and
>> they are replacing files in revision control.
> 
> ... the next question is why are they (linuxboot.bin and multiboot.bin) 
> in revision control since they do not require any strange tool to be built.
> 

They require an i386 cross compiler, which is not available on all
installations.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net