From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shan Wei Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] IP: Send a fragment reassembly time exceeded packet when enabling connection track Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:18:52 +0800 Message-ID: <4B4EE17C.60708@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <4B3191E7.8060509@cn.fujitsu.com> <4B42D1C3.3020207@trash.net> <4B4D3AD3.6050403@cn.fujitsu.com> <4B4D83FD.5040604@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:64682 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755785Ab0ANJWA (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:22:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B4D83FD.5040604@trash.net> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Patrick McHardy wrote, at 01/13/2010 04:27 PM: >> Should end hosts which are using conntrack send a fragment reassembly time exceeded message? > > Yes, they should. OK. Please ignore the patch, because the patch is wrong. With the patch, a router also send a fragment reassembly time exceeded message when reassembling timeout. I'll make a new patch to fix the problem. After testing, then submit it. -- Best Regards ----- Shan Wei